For sure, I honestly wouldn’t care, but showcasing that there aren’t reliable sources making these claims helps to dispell the Western myths about AES.
Imagine if I complained every time my Western education forced me to read some stupid propaganda. It’d be a lot more problematic than something like The Governance of China by Xi Jinping.
Stuff like 1984 and Animal Farm, literal garbage written by George Orwell, the traitor so dumb that he effectively spied for British intelligence. Nonsense like “States’ Rights” as an explanation for the US Civil War.
Exactly! I don’t get why teaching something like Marxism Leninism to be mandatory would be a bad thing. If it was up to me, I would have it mandatory for every single school year, right next to math and science.
The problem is not that they are teaching Marxism, but rather that Xi is so full of himself that he thinks his banal writing about Marxism is worth being enshrined in the Chinese constitution and taught mandatorily.
Proof me wrong by showing me some serious Marxists who think Xi’s banal writings (full of nationalism and regressive Confucianism) is adding anything worthwhile to the Marxist body of thought.
first show me evidence of “Regressive Confucianism” in the writings of Xi Jingping. And I would mention the 90 million members of the CPC, but idk if you would take their words.
For someone stanning Xi, you know surprisingly little about his “thought”. Read it yourself and you will see all the regressive Confucianism in it. Or if you (like most MLs) can’t read between the lines, do a simple Google search…
No fucking way am I using western media for knowledge on china. I need specific evidence that Xi’s thought is being pushed as the only mandatory reading in the “forced” marxist curriculum.
I never claimed it was the “only” mandatory reading. Anyways, I hope you follow through and actually read his “thought”, because you will likely understand that I am right after reading it.
This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.
For sure, I honestly wouldn’t care, but showcasing that there aren’t reliable sources making these claims helps to dispell the Western myths about AES.
Imagine if I complained every time my Western education forced me to read some stupid propaganda. It’d be a lot more problematic than something like The Governance of China by Xi Jinping.
Stuff like 1984 and Animal Farm, literal garbage written by George Orwell, the traitor so dumb that he effectively spied for British intelligence. Nonsense like “States’ Rights” as an explanation for the US Civil War.
Exactly! I don’t get why teaching something like Marxism Leninism to be mandatory would be a bad thing. If it was up to me, I would have it mandatory for every single school year, right next to math and science.
The problem is not that they are teaching Marxism, but rather that Xi is so full of himself that he thinks his banal writing about Marxism is worth being enshrined in the Chinese constitution and taught mandatorily.
Proof me wrong by showing me some serious Marxists who think Xi’s banal writings (full of nationalism and regressive Confucianism) is adding anything worthwhile to the Marxist body of thought.
first show me evidence of “Regressive Confucianism” in the writings of Xi Jingping. And I would mention the 90 million members of the CPC, but idk if you would take their words.
For someone stanning Xi, you know surprisingly little about his “thought”. Read it yourself and you will see all the regressive Confucianism in it. Or if you (like most MLs) can’t read between the lines, do a simple Google search…
No fucking way am I using western media for knowledge on china. I need specific evidence that Xi’s thought is being pushed as the only mandatory reading in the “forced” marxist curriculum.
I never claimed it was the “only” mandatory reading. Anyways, I hope you follow through and actually read his “thought”, because you will likely understand that I am right after reading it.
I do not qualify his works as reading I need to do for a very long time
So now you are the one refusing to read up on the theory… funny.