A new report has analysed the carbon footprint of the world’s most popular websites to highlight their environmental impact

Pinterest I get, it’s all about images, or the gaming sites … but for Reddit, a primarily text based collection of links and comments, to use that much energy takes some serious effort.

Of course you can see that effort just by trying to take a quick look at one thread, and seeing everything else it pulls into the page.

@Zerush@lemmy.ml
creator
link
fedilink
24M

The Carbon print not only depends on the page design or content, depends mostly on the energy resource of the server they use, green or fossil resources.

I imagine part of the story is the amount of ads and tracking. Also, if you go to the front page, you will see plenty of videos. Your personal subreddits may be primarily text-based, but it seems most people use image or video-based subreddits.

@Zerush@lemmy.ml
creator
link
fedilink
14M

Ads and tracking attempts you can test with Blacklight, putting the URL in it’s search bar. It shows all the crap of a webpage (tracking cookies, keylogger and other and of who they are.) Something similar for Android Apps is Exodus Privacy

The co2 emission methodology is not clean. The much more simple methodology would be how much cpu & gpu time spends client compuer by loading front-page. JS-bloated sites will obviosly anti-leaders, comparing to lemmy and https://old.reddit.com/

Green - An environmentalist community
!green@lemmy.ml

    This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


    RULES:

    1- Remember the human

    2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

    3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


    Related communities:


    Chat rooms:

    • 0 users online
    • 11 users / day
    • 23 users / week
    • 43 users / month
    • 138 users / 6 months
    • 18 subscribers
    • 411 Posts
    • 607 Comments
    • Modlog