You may express those ideas respectfully at wolfballs.com however I also allow pro immigrant and pro lgbt content as well.

I also offer free tech support for setting up your own instance.

Big tech censor ship hurts us all.

They need to have us in their blocklist because they could not handle the backlash if they federated. That’s all there is to it.

I know the feeling.

Hi Masterofballs here,

wolfballs is not right wing. We offer free speech. How user’s choose to use that freespeech is not up to me.

Contrast somewhere like gtio.io which (currently) doesn’t have a monoculture of narrow political views

It also doesn’t have many post yet. They do alright. Does seem to be ran my pretty left of center but they are fair to all opinions. Which is all one can ask for.

I am curious as to why you say free speech would be better without anonymity.

The concept of free speech comes from the real world. Any man can go to the public square, stand on a bucket and say what ever he wants. He can scream about corrupt politicians, judges, laws. And people can come listen to him. That freedom keeps people from doing evil things. Eventually others will start screaming too. Then pitchforks, then things start to change.

That doesn’t translate into the digital space well.

1. It’s easy to make 10 accounts and make it look like 10 people screaming in the square. This gives the allusion on consensus. (Which is a powerful tool btw. Humans seem to be hard wired to believe consensus). This is not possible without anonymity. One real person would map to one digital person.

2. Feedback. A real person Cares about what other people think about them. A anonymous person doesn’t care because he can create a new identity tomorrow. If a real person screams a lie, no one will listen to him tomorrow. A anonymous person will just create a new identity and do it again.

3. People who just make a anon accounts to post mean things on freespeech forums. And then if you ban them they scream censorship everywhere. If it was a real person they wouldn’t do that. They would reserve themselves to say something that really mattered to them.

4. Bots

Yeah I don’t have it all figured out. I’m not happy with censorship so I want a very low censorship space. And if something offends me I can use the downvote/block feature and use communities where I don’t see that content. Its not perfect. People have multiple accounts.

Free speech would probably work best where there is no anonymity.

In the real world our speech is limited by our need to be accepted socially.

An alt-right trumpster fire.

It’s meant to be more of a freespeech instance than anything else and for what it is worth I am fairly anti alt-right myself but it too has a hard time maintaining a diverse ideological spectrum.